Gianina García Troche Sebastián Marset 's wife and denied any ties to criminal organizations. She said she is the mother of his children, that she lived with him, and that they are no longer together. Her statement reframes the case and raises new questions.
Gianina García Troche appeared in Asunción and testified for the first time since her extradition. She asserted that she is not married to Sebastián Marset, that they separated a year and a half ago, and that she was not part of any criminal network. The Prosecutor's Office informed her of the alleged crimes, and she denied them point by point.
She denied being Sebastián Marset's wife
Prosecutor Deny Yoon Pak interrogated her at the Viñas Cué military prison. There, Gianina García Troche stated that she was not part of "any criminal organization," that she did not manage third-party assets, and that she did not receive benefits from "asset concealment maneuvers." She maintained that the accusation is based, in her interpretation, on conjecture and third-party accounts, not on concrete evidence.
She added a personal detail for context: "I am not Sebastián Marset's wife. I am the mother of his children. I lived with him, but I am no longer with him." This phrase sets the tone for her defense and informs her strategy.
Imputation for money laundering
Money Laundering Charges: What Is Being Investigated,” “Extradition and Chronology,” “A Ultranza Py: Background,” “Defense and Next Steps.” She was extradited from Spain in May 2025, after having been detained in July 2024 at Adolfo Suárez–Madrid Barajas Airport.
The Spanish police reported at the time that the location was achieved through international cooperation and exchanges with Interpol. Based on this information, Paraguay requested her extradition. The Spanish courts ratified it in March. The defense first requested asylum, then resigned and accepted the execution of the extradition sentence.
Chronology of extradition
That operation tracked money routes, corporate transactions, and logistical movements. The prosecution's hypothesis is that part of these flows were linked to drug trafficking organizations. Gianina García Troche , whom the Public Prosecutor's Office accuses of laundering money from international drug trafficking.
What the defense claims
The central line is simple: Gianina García Troche denies the legal relationship of "wife," denies having been part of criminal structures, and denies having managed other people's assets to hide her wealth. She claims the indictment fails to describe verifiable facts or prove a connection to illicit operations.
Her legal team insists on separating her family relationship from the criminal record. The message: motherhood and past cohabitation do not equate to criminal participation.
The environment of the Marset case
While Gianina García Troche was testifying in Paraguay, the United States maintained a reward of up to $2 million for information on Sebastián Marset's whereabouts. Suspicions about his whereabouts shifted over time, and international pressure mounted. That pressure, however, does not alone determine Gianina García Troche .
Keys to continue understanding the file
-
Personal situation: Gianina García Troche states that she has been separated for a year and a half.
-
Criminal charge: He is charged with money laundering originating from drug trafficking.
-
Evidence: The defense questions the strength of the evidence and speaks of conjecture.
-
Jurisdiction: The case is moving forward in Paraguay and is benefiting from international cooperation.
-
Political effect: every movement in the file is read through the lens of the Marset case.
How your statement impacts the case
The first investigation organizes the chronology and establishes a position. Gianina García Troche states in writing that she is not a spouse, that she was not part of a network, and that she did not manage illicit assets. This is a starting point for future proceedings: cross-referencing information, asset analysis, and financial forensics.
If the Prosecutor's Office confirms transactions or front men, the case will gain volume. If it doesn't, her story will gain strength. In any scenario, documentary consistency will be decisive.
The regional dimension of the case
The case file reflects broader phenomena: drug trafficking routes, money laundering schemes, and the role of tax havens. It also shows how a local case connects with international alerts and arrest warrants. Gianina García Troche was targeted due to her close relationship with Marset, but her criminal responsibility—if any—must be proven with facts and financial traceability.
Gianina García Troche: Key points of the accusation
-
July 2024: Arrested in Madrid during immigration controls.
-
March 2025: Spanish courts ratify the extradition.
-
May 2025: Gianina García Troche arrives in Paraguay and is imprisoned in Viñas Cué.
-
October 2025: First preliminary statement and defensive stance.
Expected next steps: requests for bank reports, cooperation with anti-money laundering units, and taking of additional statements.
A Ultranza Py: context of the case
The key will be asset tracking . If there are transfers, companies, or assets in her name or under her control, they must be substantiated. The defense will request that any unsupported inferences be ruled out. The prosecution, for its part, will seek to connect facts, dates, and beneficial owners.
Gianina García Troche wants her conduct to be measured by evidence, not by her past relationships. If the process guarantees this, the case will be stronger for any verdict.
