Gaza ceasefire plan announced by Trump and Netanyahu
President Donald Trump, along with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu , presented a ceasefire plan for Gaza that seeks to end two years of fighting. According to the US president, the agreement would be historic, although in reality it is an ultimatum to Hamas.
The plan calls for an immediate cessation of hostilities and gives Hamas 72 hours to return the Israeli hostages, both alive and deceased. In return, Israel would release some 250 prisoners serving life sentences and more than 1,700 detainees held after the October 7, 2023, attack.
Conditions and rejections
The Gaza ceasefire plan also requires Hamas to surrender its weapons and be excluded from any role in the enclave's future government. Although Israel would withdraw gradually, it would maintain a security zone within the Strip for the foreseeable future.
Hamas publicly rejected the proposal. A senior official, Taher al-Nounou, maintained that the movement was not part of the negotiations and would not accept conditions that would require it to leave power.
Analysts point out that the plan favors Israel because it does not contemplate a concrete path toward the creation of a Palestinian state. It merely mentions that, following the reconstruction of Gaza and the reform of the Palestinian Authority, the conditions for a possible process could be established.
Role of the United States
The plan calls for Gaza to be administered by a "Peace Board," headed by Trump and other international figures, including former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Trump himself stated that this is a personal commitment, which he called "an opportunity to build a better Gaza."
The proposal, however, raises doubts about its viability. International policy experts warn that if the demands are not met, Israel could intensify its offensive with Washington's support. The uncertainty surrounding Hamas's acceptance keeps the outcome open.
International context and reactions to the ceasefire plan in Gaza
The ceasefire plan for Gaza presented by Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu not only has direct implications for the Strip, but also impacts regional dynamics and the international agenda. Various actors, such as Egypt, Qatar, and the United Nations, have been indirectly mentioned, as they have historically played a mediating role in these types of negotiations. However, on this occasion, they did not formally participate in the announcement, raising questions about the viability of the proposal.
International organizations such as the UN have reiterated in recent statements that any agreement must address the urgent humanitarian needs of the civilian population. In Gaza, more than 70% of residents depend on humanitarian aid, and power and water shortages are exacerbating the crisis. If the plan does not include concrete measures to alleviate this situation, international agencies could increase diplomatic pressure .
At the same time, regional governments such as Jordan and Turkey expressed caution, warning that a ceasefire that does not contemplate a long-term political solution risks failing. The lack of a clear mention of a Palestinian state in the proposal is seen by analysts as an obstacle that could perpetuate the conflict.
At the social level, human rights organizations and community leaders on both sides have emphasized that, beyond political negotiations, the key will be ensuring security, access to food, and stability for families who have lived under violence for years.
Furthermore, international policy experts emphasize that the ceasefire plan in Gaza could redefine the balance in the Middle East, although doubts remain about its practical implementation.
