The consulting firm Factum released a new poll on Orsi's approval rating as president, recording a two-point drop between June and August, while disapproval remained stable and neutral ratings increased. According to the survey presented on VTV Noticias, by August 2025, approval will reach 44%, neutral 33%, and disapproval 22%, with 1% not knowing or not responding.
In the June survey, approval was 46%, neutral 31%, and disapproval 22%. Factum interprets this increase in neutral opinions as a high proportion of citizens who are neither approving nor disapproving five months into the administration, and maintains that the overall balance remains positive.
The consulting firm attributes this relative indifference to the short term in office and the lack of a strong imprint on the government's agenda, which it defines as a cautious start with few announcements and no profound transformations. When broken down by vote in October 2024, Factum indicates that 75% of those who voted for the Broad Front approve of the administration and only 4% disapprove; among coalition voters, 16% approve and 41% disapprove.
The report emphasizes that presidential support is strongly influenced by prior votes and that there is little cross-party support beyond the ruling party electorate. A relevant finding, the consulting firm points out, is that opposition voters do not overwhelmingly disapprove, explaining much of the volume of neutral votes.
In summary, despite slight changes compared to the previous survey, Factum believes that Orsi's approval ratings have not changed substantially. The survey was conducted by mobile phone between July 21 and August 4 with 900 participants; the margin of error is +/- 1.7% (1 sigma) and +/- 3.3% (2 sigma). For its part, the consulting firm Opción presented a survey showing 43% with a neutral evaluation, 29% considering the management to be very good or good, and 22% considering it very bad or bad; another 6% did not know or did not answer. Opción explains that the predominance of neutral evaluations is linked to the short time that has passed and the perception of an absence of significant changes, consistent with a start to the mandate without major legislative initiatives or decrees that would generate public debate.
